sustainable development

6 replies Last post
Joined: 08/05/2008
Points: 0
User offline. Last seen 2 years 3 weeks ago.
nomaan's picture

Hi,:)
I am a new user and student of LL.M(environment).

Can anyone can explain the Charecterstics, funtions, reason and importance of sustainable development in context of environment .....

Thanks.....:anyone:

Joined: 03/26/2008
Points: 0
User offline. Last seen 1 year 34 weeks ago.
Karl's picture

nomaan;5736 wrote:
Can anyone can explain the Charecterstics, funtions, reason and importance of sustainable development in context of environment .....

Welcome to the forum, nomaan. This topic is very much in line with some recent threads here on SustainabilityForum.com, which dealt with a variety of definitions of “sustainability” in relation to its various aspects/objectives:

> http://www.sustainabilityforum.com/forum/sustainability-discussion/2814-looking-definition-sustainability.html

> http://www.sustainabilityforum.com/forum/sustainability-discussion/2842-sustainability-tipping-points-realisation-benefits.html

> http://www.sustainabilityforum.com/forum/sustainability-discussion/2689-reclaiming-definition-sustainability.html

In replying to this thread, I will therefore try to avoid repeating the material already covered in the above-referenced discussions, and focus more on the issue raised in this thread – the characteristics, functions, and significance of sustainable development in the context of environmental management. In order to attempt a rationalization of sustainable development (or achieving “sustainability” in development activities) and how it relates to the environment, it may be useful to establish a proper understanding of some these main concepts.

To begin with, what is the “environment” as it pertains to sustainable development? For this purpose, the “environment” can be considered as the combined features and assets that provide the basis for economic and social development, natural resource management and conservation. In this context, sustainable management strategies, options and “best design” practices must be planned and implemented in relation to the processes, components and attributes of abiotic (non-living), biotic and human factors in any given developmental landscape.

Or to use a more formal definition:

Quote:
Environment = The combined features and resource capital, that provide the basis for development, environmental management and conservation. Includes the processes and components of, and services provided by, atmospheric, hydrological, geophysical, biotic, human and landscape factors.

Environmental quality = The status or value of the natural resource capital at a particular location at a specified time, relative to development, environmental management and conservation.

Source: Some Terminology & Definitions: Sustainability, Land Use & Impact Assessment « SUSTAINABLE LAND USE & IMPACT ASSESSMENT

From the perspective of sustainability, the goal of environmental management is to promote development in the various sectors, in an economically viable and socially acceptable manner, without causing environmental degradation. This, of course, may not sound very practical, but it represents the goal of sustainable development (ideal or desirable state of environmental quality), which must be approached by setting and attaining targets (value or state of environmental quality considered to be attainable in the short or medium term, in the interest of long-term environmental management goals).

Joined: 03/26/2008
Points: 0
User offline. Last seen 1 year 34 weeks ago.
Karl's picture

nomaan;5736 wrote:
Can anyone can explain the Charecterstics, funtions, reason and importance of sustainable development in context of environment .....

Some further discussions on these concepts that characterize “sustainable development”:

Quote:
Development: The act of altering and modifying resources in order to obtain potential benefits.

Environmental Degradation = Adverse effects (reversible or permanent) on biophysical, social and economic resources, or any other reduction of the set of options available to future generations.

Adverse Effects = Any reduction in environmental quality of a system, or other depletion of the environmental resource capital. Defined in terms of, and measured by, environmental impacts.

Environmental Impact = Change in environmental quality due to external disturbance to a system. Includes positive and negative, primary and secondary, cumulative, synergistic, short, medium and long-term, reversible and irreversible. Described in terms of magnitude (of effect), direction (of change) and probability (of occurrence), with or without mitigation

Source: Some Terminology & Definitions: Sustainability, Land Use & Impact Assessment « SUSTAINABLE LAND USE & IMPACT ASSESSMENT

In terms of discussing “development” (the act of altering and modifying the resources of the natural environment in order to obtain potential economic and social benefits), it is important to note that it involves the application of human, financial and biophysical resources to satisfy social and economic needs, inevitably leading to some modification of the biosphere. The extent of development-induced modifications depend on the location, scale, intensity and duration of activities as well as adequacy of mitigation and compensatory measures, which define the scope for, and degree of balance in, environmental costs and benefits. As noted, ideally, for a development to be “sustainable” it should demonstrably be economically feasible and socially acceptable, without causing significant environmental impacts or land degradation.

From a policy, regulatory and legislative perspective, very closely related to implementation of all of these characteristics of sustainable development, is the “Precautionary Principle” – a sustainability principle which states that if there are threats of serious irreversible environmental impact, lack of full scientific certainty will not be used as a reason for postponing measures to prevent environmental degradation.

Joined: 08/05/2008
Points: 0
User offline. Last seen 2 years 3 weeks ago.
nomaan's picture

:tiphat: Thanks Karl........

Joined: 01/17/2007
Points: 0
User offline. Last seen 1 day 15 hours ago.
GarethKane's picture
More simply...

Nature is sustainable because materials move in continuous solar powered cycles which do not poison themselves. If we managed to make our systems 'Solar, Cyclic and Safe' to quote Edwin Datschefski - we'd be sustainable in terms of the environment.

McDonough and Braungart suggest a similar three point guide which is a little more precise:

- Use solar income (not fossil fuel deposits)
- Waste = food (as in nature)
- Respect diversity (don't destroy other species)

I call these approaches "better stuff", but there are proponents of "less stuff" for example Amory Lovins who believe the answer is to get 4-10 times as much use out of each unit of resource (material, water, energy).

__________________

Gareth Kane
Terra Infirma

www.terrainfirma.co.uk
Join me on Twitter, LinkedIn & Facebook

Joined: 01/17/2007
Points: 0
User offline. Last seen 1 day 15 hours ago.
GarethKane's picture
sorry, you asked about "importance"...

The opposite of sustainability is extinction. It's that important.

__________________

Gareth Kane
Terra Infirma

www.terrainfirma.co.uk
Join me on Twitter, LinkedIn & Facebook

Joined: 11/03/2007
Points: 0
User offline. Last seen 1 year 36 weeks ago.
mybarnconversion's picture

Sustainability = addressing the needs of the present without compromising our ability to meet the needs of the future...

sustainable development follows on from there...

__________________

sustainable barn conversion
design a healthy house