SustainabilityForum.Com - Your Global Sustainability Community!

Go Back   SustainabilityForum.Com - Your Global Sustainability Community! > Topic Specific Forum > Corporate Responsibility

Corporate Responsibility Do you know companies that are responsible or can companies never be responsible? Let us know what you think about corporate responsibility or whether you have any interesting news on the topic you would like to share.


Welcome to SustainabilityForum.com, your online sustainability community!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view some discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login please contact our support.

Rate This Thread - CSR Metrics within Indirect Procurement.

Views: 228 - Replies: 1  
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2008, 06:37 PM
hightechcsr hightechcsr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2
Bookmark with:
Submit to Technorati Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Live Favorites Submit to Google Submit to Facebook
Submit as News to:
Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Hugg Submit to Care2
Default CSR Metrics within Indirect Procurement

Hello,

I am a program manager for a well-known high-tech company. I am tasked with developing a CSR program from the ground up for all indirect procurement across our organization.

One of my tasks is to develop metrics for the program. More specifically, I am tasked with creating spend goals to be awarded to socially responsible suppliers. I have done a lot of research and here are my main issues:

1 - Most CSR initiatives in the supply-chain are manufacturing based and are not applicable to most of our suppliers (mostly services-based as I am working with indirect, non-product/component spend)
2 - The case studies I have come across for indirect describe success stories for a specific category (i.e. utilize recycled paper with Office Supplies supplier, etc), but are not overarching, cross-enterprise metrics
3 - Most CSR information is too specifically focused on one of the pillars (i.e. supplier diversity, environmental goals). Those two are the most predominant and I have not found many organizations taking a holistic approach.

I am interested in accomplishing certain things with the program. Initially, I would like to ensure all suppliers comply with our Supplier Code of Conduct (fairly straight forward).

I'd also like to develop a set of questions to pose in the RFx around CSR (using the code of conduct as a reference). Here are the two metrics I'd like to define:

1 - What percent of favorable responses in the CSR portion of the RFx would be appropriate to deem the particular supplier "socially responsible"? I'm looking to benchmark against other organizations
2 - What percent of suppliers should we use as a target to be deemed socially responsible? (i.e. those suppliers that are deemed socially responsible at the RFx).

We have a target of 10% of spend to be funneled through the supplier diversity program. It is very easy to quantify this, as we have an agency that provides us with pre-approved diverse suppliers and we're able to benchmark metrics very easily (Supplier Diversity is a much more established program). I'm looking for some similar type of metric to this, but utilizing a benchmarked peer for reference.

Anybody that can provide me with insight into how to tackle this program holistically, would be greatly appreciated. Please keep in mind that I'm not that interested in manufacturing metrics, and/or category-specific metrics. We will analyze spend categories at a later time, once we've developed the entire program.

Thanks in advance!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-11-2008, 04:57 PM
csrjohn csrjohn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 2
Send a message via Skype™ to csrjohn
Bookmark with:
Submit to Technorati Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Live Favorites Submit to Google Submit to Facebook
Submit as News to:
Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Hugg Submit to Care2
Default

Hello

As an adviser to institutional investors concerned about this sort of thing, one suggestion I would have for you is to be honest, admitting real on the ground problems with suppliers and set out the steps you are taking to solve the problem. Take as an example the situation with high tech companies who use coltan. When it was revealed that a number of companies had purchased the coltan ore that came through a chain of suppliers originating in the Congo, there was a bit of an uproar. One company, I think it was Hitachi, immediately took responsibility for having purchased the material and set in process steps for preventing it in the future.

From our perspective, this was much more important than a written policy because it showed that, even when a company erred, they didn't sweep it under the rug.

I realize this doesn't answer your primary question but it serves as an adjunct to your overall effort to deal with this challenge.

Good luck.

John
Reply With Quote
Reply
Tags: , ,




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:03 PM.


3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright © 2007, SustainabilityForum.Com. All rights reserved