SustainabilityForum.Com - Your Global Sustainability Community!

Go Back   SustainabilityForum.Com - Your Global Sustainability Community! > Topic Specific Forum > Corporate Responsibility

Corporate Responsibility Do you know companies that are responsible or can companies never be responsible? Let us know what you think about corporate responsibility or whether you have any interesting news on the topic you would like to share.


Welcome to SustainabilityForum.com, your online sustainability community!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view some discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login please contact our support.

Rate This Thread - Exxon shareholder revolt gathers pace.

Views: 255 - Replies: 1  
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 23-05-2008, 06:47 PM
FabianPattberg's Avatar
FabianPattberg FabianPattberg is offline
Forum Founder
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,629
Send a message via MSN to FabianPattberg Send a message via Yahoo to FabianPattberg Send a message via Skype™ to FabianPattberg
Bookmark with:
Submit to Technorati Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Live Favorites Submit to Google Submit to Facebook
Submit as News to:
Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Hugg Submit to Care2
Default Exxon shareholder revolt gathers pace

Selected news from our partner website CorporateResponsibility.Net:

Institutional investors signal support for climate change resolutions ahead of annual meeting showdown
The shareholder campaign to force oil giant ExxonMobil to develop a more effective climate change policy yesterday announced that it has secured support from 19 institutional investors, ahead of next week's annual meeting.


A coalition of shareholders, including public investment and pension funds from California, New York, Illinois, Maine and Vermont as well as the United Methodist Church and the AFSCME public employees' union, have signalled that they intend to support five shareholder resolutions proposed by descendants of the company’s founder John D Rockefeller.
The resolutions, which are being opposed by Exxon's board, call for the company to set greenhouse gas emission targets, create a climate change task force, report on its strategy to develop new energy technologies, increase R &D spending non-renewable energy and split the role of chief executive and chairman.
Exxon has been repeatedly criticised by environmentalists for failing to follow the lead of rival oil companies such as BP and Chevron, and refusing to invest heavily in alternative energy technologies. The company has long maintained that renewable energy is uneconomical and insists that the current board is better placed than shareholders to handle strategy and governance issues.


However, dissident shareholders argued that there is a strong business case for the company to adopt a more proactive position on combating climate change.
"Exxon Mobil's go-slow approach in addressing greenhouse gas reductions and investments in renewable energy sources places long-term shareholder value at risk," said California State Treasurer Bill Lockyer, who serves on the board at CalPERS and CalSTRS, two of the nation’s public pension funds. "Instead of dragging its feet, Exxon Mobil should be taking the lead in providing long-term climate solutions."


New York City Comptroller William C. Thompson, Jr. who oversees New York City retirement system assets said that splitting the chairman and chief executive role would force the company to be more responsive to shareholder concerns. " Absent this reform, the board will continue to follow rather than lead, and shareholders will continue to be frustrated by their unresponsiveness to their important concerns," he observed.
The new coalition holds 91 million Exxon shares worth $8.6bn and while this represents just a fraction of the firm's $505bn market capitalisation, they are confident wider support for the resolutions can be secured.
Earlier this week a group of leading UK institutional investors, including F &C Asset Management and Morley Asset Management, confirmed that they would be supporting the resolution calling for the appointment of a separate chairman, in part to help stimulate greater debate at board level over the company's climate change strategy.


Source: Business Green
__________________
Welcome to SustainabilityForum.Com!

My name is Fabian Pattberg and I am the founder of this forum. For more information on me why not pay me a visit at FabianPattberg.com or simply follow me on twitter (What is twitter?) by following this link to my profile: twitter.com/FabianPattberg.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 29-05-2008, 06:39 PM
nickd nickd is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Telluride, CO
Posts: 3
Bookmark with:
Submit to Technorati Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Live Favorites Submit to Google Submit to Facebook
Submit as News to:
Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Hugg Submit to Care2
Default ExxonMobil in context

In order to frame the shareholder demands, it might be useful to ask how well (or badly) ExxonMobil is doing by its employees, its communities, the environment and society in general.

Our assessment is that ExxonMobil has a rather good reputation relative to other companies in the oil and gas business - indeed, they rank in the top quartile of all 5000 companies we have in our database.

You can see the details of the Reputation Score, and browse the supporting /dissenting Articles here:

Vanno - Exxon Mobil
Reply With Quote
Reply
Tags: , , , ,




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:52 AM.


3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright © 2007, SustainabilityForum.Com. All rights reserved