global warming documents joins ExxonMobil

[dan]

Bush aide who doctored global warming documents joins ExxonMobil
By Joseph Kay
18 June 2005

A Bush aide who reportedly altered government climate reports to favor the
interests of the oil industry has resigned from the administration to take
a job at ExxonMobil, the world’s largest energy company and most fervent
opponent of carbon emissions regulations. For the aide, Philip Cooney, the
move completes a cycle in which he has served the interests of the oil
giants both in and out of government.
The New York Times reported June 8 that, during his tenure as chief of
staff for the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), Cooney
repeatedly altered government scientific reports to deemphasize the link
between carbon emissions and global warming, and cast doubt on the science
of climate change.
The newspaper obtained the internal government documents from the
Government Accountability Project, which is representing Rick Piltz, a
former associate at the federal Climate Change Science Program that
coordinates government research on global warming and related issues.
Piltz’s office issued the documents that were later altered by Cooney.
One example of Cooney’s changes cited by the Times comes from an October
2002 draft entitled “Our Changing Planet.” The draft originally read,
“Many scientific observations indicate that the Earth is undergoing a
period of relatively rapid change.” This was modified to read, “Many
scientific observations point to the conclusion that the Earth may be
undergoing a period of relatively rapid change.”
Many of the changes were of a similar character—subtle rewordings that
cast greater doubt on the conclusiveness of scientific understandings of
climate change. On one occasion, he deleted a paragraph describing
projected effects of global warming on glacial melting, on the grounds
that the paragraph strayed “into speculative musings/findings.”
Cooney has no scientific training. Before taking the post of chief of
staff at the CEQ, he worked as a lawyer and lobbyist for the American
Petroleum Institute, the main oil industry lobbying group, which is
heavily funded by Exxon. The API has worked consistently to promote doubts
about the validity of climate change research and has opposed legislation
that would require the energy industry to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
This is not the first exposure of the CEQ’s efforts to tone down
government reports on climate change. In June 2003, the council modified
an Environmental Protection Agency report on the environment, excising
parts of a long section on global warming. The original draft stated,
“Climate change has global consequences for human health and the
environment.” This was changed to say that climate change “may have
potentially profound consequences,” but that “the complexity of the earth
system ... makes it a scientific challenge to document change.”
The CEQ demanded that the EPA remove a reference to a National Academy of
Science review confirming that climate change is caused by human activity,
in particular the production of carbon dioxide through the burning of
fossil fuels. It also had the EPA add a reference to a discredited study
funded in part by the API that discounted the evidence of climate change.
Commenting on the latest revelations, Piltz wrote in a memorandum to top
government officials responsible for climate change policy, “I have not
seen a situation like the one that has developed under this administration
during the past four years, in which politicization by the White House has
fed back directly into the science program in such a way as to undermine
the credibility and integrity of the program.” A senior EPA scientist told
the Times that the administration’s direct interference on scientific
issues “has somewhat of a chilling effect and has created a sense of
frustration” among scientists.
Perhaps more than any other energy company, Exxon—by some measures the
most valuable US company—has exerted direct influence on American policy.
Vice President Dick Cheney reportedly met with the company’s head, Lee
Raymond, within weeks of Cheney’s inauguration. Exxon also featured
prominently in the energy task force discussions headed by Cheney in 2001,
during which the Bush administration’s energy policy was planned and,
reportedly, maps of Iraqi oilfields were examined. Records of these
discussions remain secret after a federal appeals court in May dismissed a
lawsuit seeking their release
According to a June 8 article in the British Guardian, Exxon was
particularly active in urging the administration to oppose the Kyoto
protocol on global warming, .....a relatively mild international agreement that
sets out some standards for carbon dioxide emissions reductions. The US
decided to withdraw from the protocol in the spring of 2001, one of the
Bush administration’s first policy decisions.
The Guardian cites US Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs Paula
Dobriansky’s briefing paper for her meeting with the Global Climate
Coalition, an industry organization dominated by Exxon and other energy
giants. The paper, one of several documents obtained by Greenpeace through
a Freedom of Information Act request, states, “Potus [President of the
United States] rejected Kyoto in part based on input from you [the GCC].”
Dobriansky was further briefed to the effect that the administration
considered Exxon “among the companies most actively and prominently
opposed to binding approaches to cut greenhouse gas emissions.”
According to the Guardian, “Other papers suggest that Ms. Dobriansky
should sound out Exxon executives and other anti-Kyoto business groups on
potential alternatives to Kyoto.”
Recent reports demonstrate that the Bush administration continues an
active policy aimed at scuttling any international agreements or documents .....