View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 10:03 AM
Karl's Avatar
Karl Karl is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Trinidad & Tobago
Posts: 623
Send a message via AIM to Karl Send a message via Yahoo to Karl
Bookmark with:
Submit to Technorati Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Live Favorites Submit to Google Submit to Facebook
Submit as News to:
Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Hugg Submit to Care2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jadz View Post
I can sense Access and Benefits Sharing issues (ABS), among others. Will original cultivators of a 'climate-resistant' varieties of crops be equitably compensated?
Thanks for raising the important issue of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS). While this concept and the related ideas of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) are often considered in relation to native biodiversity and related resource conservation and benefit distribution, in this instance it is the closely related sector "agro-biodiversity".


For clarification purposes, some background information on the idea of Access and Benefit sharing (ABS)...

> undp.org --Access and Benefit Sharing


Quote:
Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing

Access to genetic resources and benefit sharing has been one of the most important and active themes of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). The starting point for planning in this area is CBD Article 15: Access to Genetic Resources, which reads:

1. Recognizing the sovereign rights of states over their natural resources, the authority to determine access to genetic resources rests with the national governments and is subject to national legislation.

2. Each contracting party shall endeavor to create conditions to facilitate access to genetic resources for environmentally sound uses by other Contracting parities and not to impose restrictions that run counter to the objectives of this Convention.

3. For the purpose of this Convention the genetic resourses being provided by a contracting party as referred to in this Article and Article 16 and 19, are only those that are provided by contacting parties that have acquired the genetic resources in accordance with this convention.


4. Access, where granted shall be on mutually agreed terms and subject to the provisions of this Article.


5. Access to genetic resources shall be subject to prior informed consent of the Contracting Party providing such resources, unless otherwise determined by the party.


6. Each Contracting Party shall endeavor to develop and carry out scientific research based on genetic resources provided by other Contracting Parties with the full participation of, and where possible in, such Contracting Parties.


7. Each Contacting Party shall take legislative, administrative or policy measures, as appropriate, and in accordance with Articles 16 and 19 and, where necessary, through the financial mechanism established by Articles 20 and 21 with the aim of sharing in a fair and equitable way the results of research and development and the benefits of arising from the commercial and other utilization of genetic resources with the Contracting Party providing such resources. Such Sharing shall be upon mutually agreed terms.

...

There is a huge amount of writing about Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) within the biodiversity arena and also from within the dialogues on Traditional Knowledge (TK) and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR).
Reply With Quote