View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2008, 02:06 PM
AccountAbility AccountAbility is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 11
Bookmark with:
Submit to Technorati Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Live Favorites Submit to Google Submit to Facebook
Submit as News to:
Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Hugg Submit to Care2
Default

Hey there!

The question how much sustainability reporting and assurance should be controlled or even legislated is a tricky one. My opinion is that today sustainability assurance is still a very young industry and we still need time and innovation. That is why AccountAbility does open source standards and allows all kind of individuals and organisation to use it.

In terms of policing the AA1000AS:

AccountAbility recognizes the problems of bad AA1000AS assurance. At present there is no formal mechanism to root out bad practice. There is a Certified Sustainability Assurance Practitioner qualification administered by IRCA which relates to the AA1000 series but there are no requirements relating this qualification to the AA1000AS. AccountAbility is exploring options relating to organizational accreditation which would provide greater control of practice, but the difficulties are how to implement this and encourage the wider provision and use of assurance. If the barriers are placed too high at this stage it could be a limiting factor.

What do you think: To prove accountability of assurance providers, would it be useful if they disclosed information on any commercial or important informal relationships with clients in assurance statements?
__________________

Promoting accountability innovations for sustainable development
www.accountability21.net
Reply With Quote