View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 27-06-2008, 07:02 PM
Corey Corey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Rochester MN
Posts: 490
Bookmark with:
Submit to Technorati Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Live Favorites Submit to Google Submit to Facebook
Submit as News to:
Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Hugg Submit to Care2
Default

One little catch only reason for this seemingly success is this: EU exported their carbon footprint to another country that has some of the worse environmental policy on the planet thus by doing so they actually increased there co2+equivalent when factoring in the entire consumption. Increasing Biofuel consumption when looking at the dud to dust is worse than oil by 10-12 times.

I am almost positive that they ignored those factors to make it look as if it was a win when it was really a failing grade in reality. Often times paper and reality and perspectives don't match.

Analogy: Shifting the peas around the plate then putting those peas in a bog which creates methane instead of co2 .
Which is a worse greenhouse gas.
__________________
We can talk till we are blue in the face, The real impact of change is when we take action based on information we have talked about. So lets do more action to create change.
Reply With Quote